Select your language

small logo greyA.M. GORKY INSTITUTE OF WORLD LITERATURE
OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

LITERARY FACT

Academic journal

Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia

+7 (495) 690-50-30

editor@litfact.ru

 

JATS XML:

XML

BibTEX:

BIB

Research Information Systems Citation Format:

RIS

  • DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2026-40-400-433

  • EDN:

    https://elibrary.ru/EYSENV

  • УДК / UDK: 821.161.1.1
  • Publication Type: Research Article and Publication of Archival Documents
  • Received: 11.03.2026
  • Approved after reviewing: 20.04.2026
  • Date of publication: 25.06.2026
  • Issue:

    no. 2 (40), 2026

  • Author: Nikita V. Moroz
  • About the author:

    Nikita V. Moroz, Junior Research Fellow, А.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

    ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4211-6477

    E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

  • Abstract:

    The article examines the history of one of the largest unrealized projects of “Literaturnoe nasledstvo” — the so-called Slavic volume (“Russian Literature and the Foreign Slavic World”), which was in preparation from 1970 to 1975. The focus is on the Czech materials of the volume: the editorial correspondence with Czechoslovak academic institutions and individual scholars, the history of assembling the contributors, and the evolution of the thematic concept of the Czech section. Drawing on archival documents from the “Literaturnoe nasledstvo” fonds at the manuscript department of IWL, the article reconstructs the preparation of the volume: from the first contacts with the Institute of Languages and Literature of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences in 1970 to the final decision to abandon the project in 1976. Particular attention is paid to the political context — the consequences of the events of 1968 for Soviet-Czechoslovak scholarly relations and the way the normalization policy affected the composition of the Czech contributors. The article also analyzes the institutional conditions that gave rise to the project: the role of IWL and its Department of Socialist Literatures, as well as the Institute of Slavic and Balkan Studies of the USSR Academy of Sciences, as the key centers for the study of Russian-Slavic literary relations in the 1960s – 1970s. The article argues that the project’s failure stemmed from a fundamental contradiction between the editorial model of Literaturnoe nasledstvo“Literaturnoe nasledstvo” — oriented toward introducing new archival sources into scholarly circulation — and the ideologically prescribed framework for selecting material, which prevented the formation of a volume meeting the publication’s scholarly standards.

  • Keywords: “Literaturnoe nasledstvo”, unrealized publishing projects, Russian-Czech literary relations, Soviet literary scholarship, history of scholarship.
  • For citation:

    Moroz, N.V. “From the History of the Unpublished Slavic Volume of ‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’: Czech Materials.” Literaturnyi fakt, no. 2 (40), 2026, pp. 400–433. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2026-40-400-433

  • References:
    1. Aksenova, P. “Institut slavianovedeniia i balkanistiki RAN za 50 let (1947– 1997). Kratkii istoricheskii ocherk” [“The Institute of Slavic and Balkan Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences over 50 Years (1947–1997): A Brief Historical Essay”]. Institut slavianovedeniia i balkanistiki: 50 let: sbornik statei [Institute of Slavic and Balkan Studies: 50 Years: Collected Articles]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 1996, pp. 33–63. (In Russ.)
    2. Galushkin, Iu., Frolov, M.A. “Slishkom ‘Novoe o Maiakovskom’” [“It’s All Too Much ‘New Materials on Mayakovsky’”]. Literaturnyi fakt, no. 5, 2017, pp. 288–294. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2017-5-288-372 (In Russ.)
    3. Kudelin, B., Moskovskaia, D.S., and M.L. Spivak. “‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’ za vse eti gody bylo takim bol’shim delom…’. K 90-letiiu akademicheskoi serii ‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’.” [“‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’ over All These Years Was Such a Big Thing…’: On the 90th Anniversary of the Academic Series ‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’.”]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, vol. 92, no. 2, 2022, pp. 118–124. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587322020050 (In Russ.)
    4. Kurilov, A.S. Institut mirovoi literatury im. A.M. Gor’kogo: in 2 kn. [А.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences: in 2 books], book 2: Nauchno-issledovatel’skaia deiatel’nost’, 1946–1982 [Research Activities, 1946–1982]. Moscow, IWL RAS , 2025. 376 p. (In Russ.)
    5. Lotman, M. “Ian Mukarzhovskii — teoretik iskusstva (vstupitel’naia stat’ia)” [“Jan Mukařovský — Art Theorist (Introductory Article)”]. Mukarzhovskii, Ia. Issledovaniia po estetike i teorii iskusstva [Studies in Aesthetics and Theory of Art]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1994, pp. 8–34. (In Russ.)
    6. Sorokin, A. “Problemy vzaimootnoshenii vlasti i nauchnoi intelligentsii v Chekhoslovakii v kontekste sobytii Prazhskoi vesny” [“Problems of Relations between the Authorities and the Scientific Intelligentsia in Czechoslovakia in the Context of the Prague Spring Events”]. Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniia, no. 5, 2025, pp. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2025.5.75805 (In Russ.)
    7. Fedorov, L. “‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’: neizdannye ‘pol’skie’ toma” [“‘Literaturnoe nasledstvo’: Unpublished ‘Polish’ Volumes”]. Przegląd Rusycystyczny, no. 2 (154), 2016, pp. 121–134. (In Russ.)
    8. Míšková, Alena, Barvíková, Hana, and Miroslav Šmidák. Československá akademie věd 1969–1972. Restaurace koministické moci ve vědě. Praha, Ústav pro soudobé dějny AV ČR , 1998. 149 p. (In Czech)
    9. Strohsová, “Zpráva o diskusi.” Česká literaturа, roč. 12, no. 2, 1964, pp. 145–154. (In Czech)