Select your language

small logo greyA.M. GORKY INSTITUTE OF WORLD LITERATURE
OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

LITERARY FACT

Academic journal

Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia

+7 (495) 690-50-30

editor@litfact.ru

 

JATS XML:

XML

BibTEX:

BIB

Research Information Systems Citation Format:

RIS

  • DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2025-38-358-374

  • EDN:

    https://elibrary.ru/VDUAQS

  • УДК / UDK: 821.161.1.0
  • Publication Type: Research Article
  • Received: 17.03.2025
  • Approved after reviewing: 16.06.2025
  • Date of publication: 25.12.2025
  • Issue:

    no. 4 (38), 2025

  • Author: Svetlana Yu. Pavlova
  • About the author:

    Svetlana Yu. Pavlova, DSc in Philology, Associate Professor, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya St., 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia.

    ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-2772

    E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

  • Abstract:

    The article is based on research into Russian-French literary connections and explores the influence of Molière’s comedies on Pushkin’s work. The focus is on an issue that has not yet been studied in Russian literary studies: the direct source of the lost play of the young poet, to which the epigram “Dis-moi, pourquoi l’Escamoteur <…>” refers, known from the memoirs of his sister Olga Pavlishcheva. Based on a lexical-semantic analysis of Pushkin’s epigram title, an assumption is made that the plot of Molière’s play, which served as the basis for the composition of the aspiring Russian poet, included the motif for the heroine’s kidnapping by her lover (Le Médecin volant, publ. 1819; L’Amour médecin, 1665; Le Médecin malgré lui, 1666; Le Sicilien ou l’Amour peintre, 1667). The plays of the French playwright containing this motif are examined from the point of view of their significance in the plot, linguistic means of expression, genre specificity, their correlation with the courtly and salon customs of the reign of Louis XIV, and popularity in the Russian cultural field. The study refutes the assumption in Russian science that the source of Pushkin’s borrowing could be one of Molière’s early farces. The author comes to the conclusion that the comedy that Pushkin was guided by was gallant in nature, meeting both the tastes of the French public of the second half of the 17th century and the atmosphere of home readings and improvisations, familiar to the Russian poet from childhood. The conclusions contain the author’s hypothesis about Molière’s comedy, which became the basis of Pushkin’s lost play and is mentioned in his epigram.

  • Keywords: Alexander Pushkin, Molière, literary source, literary influence, Russian-French literary connections, gallantry.
  • For citation:

    Pavlova, S.Yu. “About the Molière Source of Young Pushkin’s Lost Work.ˮ Literaturnyi fakt, no. 4 (38), 2025, pp. 358–374. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2025-38-358-374

  • References:
    1. Akimova, I. Literaturnoe tvorchestvo Ekateriny II: “galantnyi dialog” v sisteme avtorskikh strategii (istoki, funktsii, zhanry) [Literary Work of Catherine II: “Gallant Dialogue” in the System of Author’s Strategies (Origins, Functions, Genres): DSc Dissertation]. Moscow, 2015. 465 p. (In Russ.)
    2. Andreev, L. Klassicheskaia evropeiskaia komediia: struktura i formy [Classi- cal European Comedy: Structure and Forms]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2011. 234 p. (In Russ.)
    3. Vol’pert, I. Pushkinskaia Frantsiia [Pushkin’s France]. 2nd ed., rev. and enl. Tartu, 2010. Internet Publication. 570 p. (In Russ.)
    4. Gak, G., and K.A. Ganshina. Novyi frantsuzsko-russkii slovar’ [New French-Russian Dictionary]. Moscow, Russkii iazyk Publ., 1993. 1194 p. (In Russ.)
    5. Golubkov, V. Pretsioznost’ i galantnaia traditsiia vo frantsuzskoi salonnoi literature XVII veka [Preciosité and Gallant Tradition in French Salon Literature of the 17th Century]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2017. 294 p. (In Russ.)
    6. Grechanaia, P. Kogda Rossiia govorila po-frantsuzski: russkaia literatura na frantsuzskom iazyke (XVIII – pervaia polovina XIX veka) [When Russia Spoke French: Russian Literature in French (18th – First Half of the 19th Century)]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2010. 383 p. (In Russ.)
    7. Dunaeva, A. Velikii litsedei ili obmanshchik: Evoliutsiia farsa v vysokikh komediiakh Mol’era [The Great Actor or Deceiver: The Evolution of Farce in the High Comedies of Molière]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Navona Publ., 2018. 398 p. (In Russ.)
    8. Dunaeva, A. “O russkom Mol’ere” [“About the Russian Molière”]. Voprosy teatra. Proscaenium, no. 3/4, 2018, pp. 244–255. (In Russ.)
    9. Zaborov, R. “Svistunov Petr Semenovich” [“Svistunov Petr Semenovich”]. Panchenko, A.M., editor. Slovar’ russkikh pisatelei XVIII v. [Dictionary of Russian Writers of the 18th Century], issue 3: R–Ia [R–Ya]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2010, pp. 101–103. (In Russ.)
    10. Zaitseva, V. Artikuliatsiia privilegirovannoi evropeiskoi kul’turnoi modeli Novogo vremeni: galantnaia epokha XVII v. [Articulation of the Privileged European Cultural Model of the Modern Period: The Gallant Era the 17th Century: DSc Dissertation]. St. Peterburg, 2022. 506 p. (In Russ.)
    11. Pavlishchev, L.N. Iz semeinoi khroniki: A.S. Pushkin [From a Family Chronicle: A.S. Pushkin]; Arapova, A.P. Natal’ia Nikolaevna Pushkina-Lanskaia [Natalya Nikolaevna Pushkina-Lanskaya], ed., preface, text prep. and comm. by G.A. Galina. Moscow, Tri veka istorii Publ., 512 p. (In Russ.)
    12. Podgaetskaia, I.Iu. “O frantsuzskom klassicheskom stile” [“About the French Classic Style”]. Podgaetskaia, I.Iu. Izbrannye stat’i [Selected Articles]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2009, pp. 120–151. (In Russ.)
    13. Saikina, V. “Aleksei Mikhailovich Pushkin” [“Alexey Mikhailovich Push- kin”]. Russkie pisateli. 1800–1817. Biograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Writers. 1800–1817. Biographical Dictionary], vol. 5: P–S [P–S], ed. by P.A. Nikolaev. Moscow, Bol’shaia Rossiiskaia entsiklopediia Publ., 2007, pp. 216–218. (In Russ.)
    14. Tomashevskii, V., and L.I. Vol’pert. “Mol’er” [“Molière”]. Pushkin: Issledo- vaniia i materialy [Pushkin: Research and Materials], vol. 18–19: Pushkin i mirovaia literatura. Materialy k “Pushkinskoi entsiklopedii” [Pushkin and World Literature. Materials for the Pushkin Encyclopedia], ed. by V.D. Rak. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004, pp. 209–211. (In Russ.)
    15. Tyrkova-Vil’iams, A.V. Zhizn’ Pushkina: v 2 t. [Pushkin’s Life: in 2 vols.], vol. 1: 1799–1824 [1799–1824]. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Publ., 1998. 471 p. (In Russ.)
    16. Denis, Le Parnasse galant. Instruction d’une catégorie littéraire au XVII siècle. Paris, Honoré Champion éd., 2001. 390 p. (In French)
    17. Louvat-Molozay, Bénédicte, Claude Bourqui, et Anne Piéjus. “Note sur le texte.” Molière. Œuvres complètes: en 2 vol., t. 1, sous la direction de G. Forestier et C. Bourqui. Paris, Gallimard, 2010, pp. 1497–1505. (In French)
    18. Molière. “Le médecin malgré ” Molière. Œuvres complètes: en 2 vol., t. 1, sous la direction de G. Forestier et C. Bourqui. Paris, Gallimard, 2010, pp. 731–766. (In French)
    19. Molière. “Le Sicilien, ou L’Amour peintre.” Molière. Œuvres complètes: en 2 vol., t. 1, sous la direction de G. Forestier et C. Bourqui. Paris, Gallimard, 2010, pp. 807–827. (In French)
    20. Rey-Flaud, Molière et la farce. Genève, Droz, 1996. 267 p. (In French)
    21. Viala, La France galante. Essai historique sur une catégorie culturelle, de ses origines jusqu’à la Révolution. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2008. 540 p. (In French)