- Author: Alexey E. Kozlov (text prep. and comment.)
- УДК / UDK: 822.214.171.124+82.0
- About the author:
Alexey E. Kozlov — PhD in Philology, Researcher, Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nikolaeva str. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-9546
The publication was prepared for the 200th anniversary of Dmitry Grigorovich, who was a contemporary of Turgenev, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky and whose literary and journalistic heritage still requires commentary and research reflection. The article presents an unfinished essay by Dmitry Grigorovich “Who is to blame?” Probably Grigorovich worked on the essay for the last ten years of his life, but the question posed in the essay remained unresolved. Grigorovich turns to the analysis of xenophobia. In the exposition of the essay, relying on his own observations and emotions, he writes about nationalism. Speaking about the external attributes of the nation, explaining his childhood and youthful fears, the writer is the most tendentious: he describes irrational phobias, trying to argue his right not only not to accept others, but also to be afraid of the appearance of representatives of other peoples. This part of the work ends with a discussion about the stereotypes that people have in relation to different nations. The main part of the essay refutes the preliminary judgments made earlier: it is devoted to the history of a Jewish master from Vilna and an executive Baltic official Gaberbir. Unlike Fjodor Dostoevsky, who formulated his position on this matter in the “Diary of a Writer,” Mikhail Katkov and Konstantin Pobedonostsev, who pursued a tendentious nationalist line in periodicals, Dmitry Grigorovich refuses to reach a verdict, although he raises a question that cannot be answered on the pages of his work. Moreover, the issue that bothered the writer was resolved by Anton Chekhov, who managed to translate Russian literature into a universal dimension.
The essay is published in accordance with the rules of modern spelling and punctuation; occasional errors are corrected.
- Keywords: Russian literature of the 19th century, Grigorovich, identity, national question, xenophobia, self-reflection.
- For citation:
“D.V. Grigorovich: ‘Who is to Blame?’,” text prep. and comment. by A.E. Kozlov. Literaraturnyi fakt, no. 2 (24), 2022, pp. 152–168. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2022-24-152-168
1. “Vokrug romana ‘Proselochnye dorogi’: perepiska D.V. Grigorovicha i A.A. Kraevskogo 1850–1852 godov” [“Around the Novel ‘Country Roads’: Correspondence between D.V. Grigorovich and A.A. Kraevsky, 1850–1852”]. Russkaia literatura, no. 2, 2022, pp. 146–160. DOI: 10.31860/0131-6095-2022-2-152-166 (In Russ.)
2. Grigorovich, D.V. Literaturnye vospominaniia [ Literary Memoirs], ed. by G.G. Elizavetina. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literature Publ., 1987. 202 p. (In Russ.)
3. Grossman, L.P. “Dostoevskii i pravitel’stvennye krugi 1870-kh gg.” [“Dostoevsky and Government Circles in the 1870s.”]. Literaturnoe nasledstvo, vol. 15, 1934, pp. 109–114 (In Russ.)
4. Dostoevsky, F.M. “Zimnie zametki o letnikh vpechatleniiakh” [“Winter Notes on Summer Impressions”]. Sobranie sochinenii: v 15 t. [ Collected Works: in 15 vols.], vol. 4. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1989, pp. 388–451. (In Russ.)
5. Dostoevsky, F.M. “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” [“Crime and Punishment”]. Sobranie sochinenii: v 15 t. [Collected Works: in 15 vols.], vol. 5. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1989, pp. 5–520. (In Russ.)
6. Dostoevsky, F.M. “Brat’ia Karamazovy” [“The Brothers Karamazov”]. Sobranie sochinenii: v 15 t. [Collected Works: in 15 vols.], vol. 9. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 5–570. (In Russ.)
7. Dumas, A. Putevye vpechatleniia v Rossii: v 3 t. [Travel Impressions of Russia: in 3 vols.], vol. 2. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 1993. 303 p. (In Russ.)
8. “Iz zapisnoi knizhki D.V. Grigorovicha” [“From the Notebook of D.V. Grigorovich”]. Literaturnye prilozheniia k “Nive.” St. Petersburg, [S. n.], 1901, pp. 610–645. (In Russ.)
9. Lotman, L.M. “Grigorovich” [“Grigorovich”]. Istoriia russkoi literatury: v 10 t. [History of Russian Literature: in 10 vols.], vol. 7. Moscow, Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1955, pp. 301–339. (In Russ.)
10. Meshcheriakov, V.P. Grigorovich: pisatel’ i iskusstvoved [Grigorovich as a Writer and Art Critic]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1985. 176 p. (In Russ.)
11. Odoevsky, V.F. Skazki i rasskazy dedushki Irineia [ Tales and Stories of Grandfather Iriney]. St. Petersburg, A.S. Suvorin Publ., 1889. 145 p. (In Russ.)
12. Otradin, M.V. “Grigorovich i Kol’tsov (K probleme narodnogo kharaktera v russkoi literature 40-kh godov XIX veka)” [“Grigorovich and Koltsov (On the Problem of Peasants Character in Russian Literature of the 40s of the 19th Century”]. Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta. Seriia istorii, iazyka i literatury, no. 2, 1982, pp. 38–45. (In Russ.)
13. Panchenko, A.A. “K issledovaniiu ‘evreiskoi temy’ v istorii russkoi slovesnosti: siuzhet o ritual'nom ubiistve” [“On the Study of the ‘Jewish Theme’ in the History of Russian Literature: the Plot of a Ritual Murder”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 104, 2010, pp. 79–113. (In Russ.)
14. Solov’ev, A. Problema “Rossiia i Evropa” v russkikh literaturnykh puteshestviiakh (Fonvizin — Karamzin — Dostoevskii) [ The Problem of “Russia and Europe” in Russian Literary Travels (Fonvizin — Karamzin — Dostoevsky)]. Tartu, Tartu University Press, 2022. 210 p. (In Russ.)
15. Chekhov A.P. Povesti i rasskazy [Stories and Tales]. Moscow, I.D. Sytin Publ., 1894. 285 p. (In Russ.)
16. Goldstein, D.I. Dostoyevski and the Jews. Austin, University of Texas Press, 1981. 303 p. (In English)
The research was funded by Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project no. 21-78-00011.