“Let it be Empty”: “The Curse of Eudokia” and its Reception in Russian Culture of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2023-27-173-194
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/QUTQAU
УДК / UDK: 821.161.1.0
Issue:

2023 №27
Author: Konstantin V. Dushenko
About the author:

Konstantin V. Dushenko — DSc in History, Senior Researcher, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the. Russian Academy of Sciences, Nakhimovsky Prospekt 27, 51/21, 117997 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7708-1505

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract:

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the leitmotif of the theme of the end of St. Petersburg is the so-called “curse of Evdokia”: “Petersburg to be empty.” This is a contamination of two quotes from the Petrine era. Both of them, when they appeared, did not have any distinct eschatological sound, and both were not known in the era of romanticism. From the 1860s to the beginning of the 20th century the prophecy “Let it be empty” was cited as a formula of the retrograde of the reign of Peter the Great, moreover as a prediction or threat, but not a curse. Actual eschatological sound was given to him by Merezhkovsky in the novels “Peter and Alexei” (1904–1905), “Alexander I” (1911–1912) and the article “Petersburg to be empty” (1908). The formula “St. Petersburg to be empty” entered the political agenda on the eve and after the February Revolution, in connection with rumors about the surrender of Petrograd to the Germans and the government moving to Moscow. Afterwards the 19th centuries prophecies were perceived by the eyes of the creators of the Russian symbolism. The result of such distorted optics was the idea of the formula “Let it be empty” as the original curse that gravitates over St. Petersburg, as well as identification of this formula with the eschatology of the Old Believers.
Keywords: Petersburg text, St. Petersburg myth, eschatology, prophecies, Russian Symbolists, Tsarina Eudokia, Peter I, D.L. Mordovtsev, D.S. Merezhkovsky, V.N. Toporov.
For citation:

Dushenko, K.V. “ʽLet it be Empty’: ‘The Curse of Eudokia’ and its Reception in Russian Culture of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries.” Literaturnyi fakt, no. 1 (27), 2023, pp. 173–194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2023-27-173-194
References:

1. Antsiferov, N.P. Dusha Peterburga; Peterburg Dostoevskogo; Byl’ i mif Peterburga [Soul of Petersburg; Petersburg of Dostoevsky; Reality and Myth of Petersburg]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1991. 84, [5] p. (In Russ.)

2. Bernadskii, S.V. “Obraz Peterburga v ‘Otryvke’ III chasti ‘Dziadov’ A. Mitskevicha i ego rol’ v formirovanii literaturnoi traditsii goroda” [“The Image of St. Petersburg in the ‘Fragment’ of the III Part of ‘Dziady’ by A. Mickiewicz and its Role in the Formation of the Literary Tradition of the City”]. Antsiferovskie chteniia: Materialy i tezisy konferentsii (20–22 dekabria 1989 g.) [ Antsiferov Readings: Materials and Abstracts of the Conference (December 20–22, 1989)]. Leningrad, Leningradskoe otdelenie Sovetskogo fonda kul’tury Publ., 1989, pp. 107–110. (In Russ.)

3. Bushkovich, P. “Istorik i vlast’: delo tsarevicha Alekseia (1716–1718) i N.G. Ustrialov (1845–1859)” [“Historian and Power: The Case of Tsarevich Alexei (1716–1718) and N.G. Ustryalov (1845–1859)”]. Amerikanskaia rusistika: Vekhi istoriografii poslednikh let. Imperatorskii period: Antologiia [ American Russian Studies: Milestones of Historiography in Recent Years. Imperial Period: An Anthology]. Samara, Samara University Publ., 2000, pp. 80–120. (In Russ.)

4. Veidle, V.V. Zadacha Rossii [Russia’s Challenge]. New York, Izdatel’stvo imeni Chekhova Publ., 1956. 230, [1] p. (In Russ.)

5. Golynko-Vol’fson, D. “Peterburg: krakh mifa i krizis illiuzii” [“Petersburg: the Collapse of the Myth and the Crisis of Illusions”]. Na dne, issue 4, 1998. Available at: http://www.pressa.spb.ru/newspapers/na_dne/arts/na_dne-37-art-8.html (Accessed 08 September 2019). (In Russ.)

6. Grinlif, M. Pushkin i romanticheskaia moda: Fragment. Elegiia. Orientalizm. Ironiia [Pushkin and Romantic Fashion: Fragment. Elegy. Orientalism. Irony]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2006. 381 p. (In Russ.)

7. Gur’ianova, N.S. “Eskhatologicheskoe uchenie staroverov i messianskoe tsarstvo” [“The Eschatological Doctrine of the Old Believers and the Messianic Kingdom”]. Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri, no. 2, 2000, pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)

8. Dolgopolov, L.K. “Mif o Peterburge i ego preobrazovanie v nachale veka” [“The Myth of St. Petersburg and Its Transformation at the Beginning of the Century”]. Dolgopolov, L.K. Na rubezhe vekov: O russkoi literature kontsa ХIХ – nachala ХХ veka [At the Turn of the Century: On Russian Literature of the Late 19th – Early 20th Century]. Leningrad, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1977, pp. 150–194. (In Russ.)

9. Dushenko, K.V. “Peterburgskaia legenda o navodnenii i mif o ‘kontse Peterburga’.” [“The St. Petersburg Flood Legend and the Myth of the ‘End of St. Petersburg’.”]. Filosofiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, pp. 34–54. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2021-2-34-54 (In Russ.)

10. Efimov, S.V. “Evdokiia Lopukhina — posledniaia russkaia tsaritsa XVII veka” [“Evdokia Lopukhina — the Last Russian Tsarina of the 17th Century”]. Srednevekovaia Rus’: Sbornik nauchnykh statei k 65-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia professora R.G. Skrynnikova [Medieval Rus’: Collection of Scientific Articles Dedicated to the 65th Anniversary of the Birth of Professor R.G. Skrynnikov]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publ., 1995, pp. 136–163. (In Russ.)

11. Isupov, K.G. “Istoricheskaia mistika Peterburga” [“Historical Mysticism of St. Petersburg”]. Metafizika Peterburga [Metaphysics of St. Petersburg], issue 1. St. Petersburg, Eidos Publ., 1993, pp. 63–73. (In Russ.)

12. Krasnova, T.I. “Tipy emigrantskikh gazet 1918 g. po soderzhatel’no-ideologicheskim priznakam (opyt izucheniia soderzhaniia i formy)” [“Types of Emigre Newspapers in 1918 According to its Content and Ideological Features (The Experience of Studying the Content and Form)”]. Vestnik S.-Peterburgskogo universitetata: Istoriia, iazykoznanie, literaturovedenie, no. 3, 1995, pp. 107–109. (In Russ.)

13. Likhachev, D.S. Nikolai Pavlovich Antsiferov [Nikolai Pavlovich Antsiferov]; Kumpan, K.A., and A.M. Konechnyi. Kommentarii k faksimil’noi chasti; Spisok pereimenovannykh toponimov Peterburga [Comments to the Facsimile Part; List of Renamed Toponyms of St. Petersburg]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1991. 101 p. (In Russ.)

14. Nikolozi, R. Peterburgskii panegirik XVIII veka: Mif — ideologiia — ritorika [St. Petersburg Panegyric of the 18th Century: Myth — Ideology — Rhetoric]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., 2009. 215 p. (In Russ.)

15. Ospovat, A.L., and R.D. Timenchik. “Pechal’nu povest’ sokhranit’...”: Ob avtore i chitateliakh “Mednogo vsadnika” [“To Save the Sad Story...”: About the Author and Readers of “The Bronze Horseman”]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1987. 350 p. (In Russ.)

16. Panchenko, A.A. “Peterburg kak stolitsa skoptsov” [“St. Petersburg as the Capital of Eunuchs”]. Otechestvennye zapiski, no. 2, 2004, pp. 158–169. (In Russ.)

17. Toporov, V.N. “Peterburg i ‘Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury’ (Vvedenie v temu)” [“St. Petersburg and ‘St. Petersburg Text of Russian Literature’ (Introduction to the Topic)”]. Toporov, V.N. Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury: Izbrannye trudy [ Petersburg Text of Russian Literature: Selected Works]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB Publ., 2003, pp. 7–118. (In Russ.)